Hot Posts

6/recent/ticker-posts

Ad Code

ADVERTISEMENT

AITA Girlfriend sold my brother he car for $6000 on a payment plan. He totaled the car and gave it to me totaled. I don’t cover the remainder of his payment plan

AITA for refusing to take over my brother’s car payments after I repaired the wreck he handed me?

My girlfriend sold my brother a car on a $6,000 payment plan with a signed contract and a lien on the title. After he wrecked it and let it sit, he handed the non-working car to me — I fixed it, but when he later asked me to assume the remaining $2,000 debt I said no. Now my whole family thinks I’m in the wrong.

My girlfriend originally sold my brother the car on a $6,000 payment plan and had him sign a written contract; the title is in his name with her listed as lienholder. He started missing payments, then got into a front-end collision that left the car undrivable. He told my girlfriend he was going to junk it and even asked her to sign off the lien so he could, so she made him sign another agreement. Instead of junking it, he later gave the broken car to me. I offered him $400 for it as a better option than scrapping it, but he declined and said he'd just take whatever it sold for later. I took the vehicle, brought it to a mechanic, and paid to have it fixed.

I fixed my brother’s totaled car because I wanted to save him money, but I never agreed to take on his remaining payments—when he later demanded I cover the $2,000 he still owed my girlfriend, I refused and the family turned on me.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


After I repaired the car it was worth roughly free–$1,000 at most. For months my brother continued making payments toward the $6,000 plan, but about four months later he texted me: “You’re going to have to take over the payments now.” I was stunned—at no point did I agree to assume his debt. I offered to give the car back to him instead of paying the remaining $2,000, but he refused. He had previously declined my $400 offer and chosen to keep the car, so I fixed it to help, not to inherit his loan.

"I offered him $400 and he declined — I never agreed to take over his payments."

The title is still in his name with my girlfriend listed as lienholder; he never removed the lien. He’d been late on payments without explanation, and after the accident he’d demanded the lien be signed off so he could junk the car—she agreed and made him sign paperwork. Instead he gave the car to me and later tried to palm off the remaining debt. I told him it was his responsibility. I even offered to return the car, but he declined, insisting I pay for it instead. When I refused, the whole family turned on me.

"You’re going to have to take over the payments now."

Eventually my brother’s girlfriend paid off the remaining debt to my girlfriend, but family members still argue I should have covered it. The car remains titled in my brother’s name with the lien initially unremoved, and I moved on after fixing it and refusing to accept responsibility for a loan I never signed up for.

🏠 The Aftermath

After I stood my ground, my brother’s girlfriend stepped in and paid off the remaining $2,000 to my girlfriend. That settled the contract debt, but family tensions remained high: relatives insisted I should have absorbed the cost because I’d taken the car and fixed it. The title still lists my brother as owner with the original lien circumstances lingering in family memory.

From my side, I spent time and money repairing the vehicle and expect that fixing it was my contribution—not an automatic assumption of his contractual obligation. From the family’s perspective, me driving the car and benefiting from it made them think I should cover the payments. That disagreement is what caused most of the fallout.

In the end, the debt was cleared by my brother’s partner, but the relationships were damaged: relatives who sided with him still feel I shirked responsibility, while I feel I was unfairly pressured to pay a loan I never agreed to.

"I fixed the car to save it from the junkyard—not to inherit a $2,000 debt I never signed up for."

The situation exposed how quickly family expectations and paperwork misunderstandings can turn into accusations, even after contracts and titles exist that clarify responsibility.

ADVERTISEMENT

💭 Emotional Reflection

This is a classic clash between legal/documented responsibility and family expectations. On paper, the contract, title, and lien point to my brother’s obligation. Emotionally, though, seeing him hand me the wrecked car and later demand I take over payments feels like a bait-and-switch. I fixed something he had abandoned, but fixing it shouldn’t rewrite the loan he initially agreed to.

Could I have handled the handoff differently? Maybe clearer paperwork or a written agreement at the time I took the car would have prevented the dispute. But when a family member later asks you to shoulder a debt you never signed for, you’re right to push back—especially when the title and liens still reflect the original arrangement.

Reasonable people can sympathize with both sides: the brother stressed about leaving for the army, and the partner who used her savings for tuition and expected payments to be made. Still, contracts and transparent communication matter most when money and ownership are involved.


Here’s how the community might see it:

“You didn’t sign the loan; he did. Fixing the car was a favor, not an agreement to assume his debt.”
“Family pressure won’t override a contract or title—this was handled poorly but legally it wasn’t your obligation.”
“A written agreement when you took the car would have saved you—lesson learned, but you’re not the AH.”

Most reactions will likely back the idea that documented responsibility matters more than assumptions, while also noting the emotional complexity when family is involved.


🌱 Final Thoughts

Fixing a family member’s problem is generous, but generosity shouldn’t turn into unpaid liability without clear agreement. Contracts, titles, and liens exist to prevent exactly this kind of mess—use them early and often.

You helped salvage a car someone else had abandoned; you didn’t sign up to pay their loan. If family dynamics sour over that, it’s unfortunate—but legally and ethically, asking you to take over a debt you never accepted is unreasonable.

What do you think?
Would you have taken the payments to keep the peace, or stood firm like I did? Share your thoughts below 👇


Post a Comment

0 Comments

ADVERTISEMENT